<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Now What?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://effectivecio.com/2009/11/11/now-what/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://effectivecio.com/2009/11/11/now-what/</link>
	<description>...ruminations on many things, all ultimately related to effective IT leadership...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 22:44:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Prince</title>
		<link>http://effectivecio.com/2009/11/11/now-what/#comment-1129</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Prince]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://effectivecio.com/?p=1486#comment-1129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I also opened a G-wave account a few weeks ago, and had much the same experience as you Chuck. I hadn&#039;t extended the experience to other platforms as you have, partly because I just felt like that&#039;s the cost of trying new stuff on the web (and partly because I&#039;m rarely insightful enough to extend experiences so well...nicely done).

It&#039;s a good point, but I think there&#039;s a caveat. G-Wave, like Twitter, FB, and the others, become useful at the point where users begin connecting in a real way within the platform; or at a higher level, when the platform rewards the new user in a tangible way. If you go into the signup process without a clear purpose of what you&#039;re trying to accomplish, you&#039;re bound to be left with the &quot;what now?&quot;  

Unfortunately, that&#039;s how most of us go in. [Example - I went into LinkedIn with the explicit purpose of recruiting a couple of specialists and was rewarded with the functionality for that task. I went into Twitter to see what the hype was all about, and was left guessing.]

Perhaps the answer is the platform should reward the new user in some substantial way on enrollment. Make sure the site provides a needed service, and does it well right away. The first time. Or perhaps show the user, in simple terms, the benefit to them of recruiting their friends and co-workers to the platform (something I don&#039;t think we&#039;ve seen from G-Wave).

Basically, if you want us to think your platform rocks, prove it the first time.

Another great post Chuck.

All IMHO,

David.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also opened a G-wave account a few weeks ago, and had much the same experience as you Chuck. I hadn&#8217;t extended the experience to other platforms as you have, partly because I just felt like that&#8217;s the cost of trying new stuff on the web (and partly because I&#8217;m rarely insightful enough to extend experiences so well&#8230;nicely done).</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a good point, but I think there&#8217;s a caveat. G-Wave, like Twitter, FB, and the others, become useful at the point where users begin connecting in a real way within the platform; or at a higher level, when the platform rewards the new user in a tangible way. If you go into the signup process without a clear purpose of what you&#8217;re trying to accomplish, you&#8217;re bound to be left with the &#8220;what now?&#8221;  </p>
<p>Unfortunately, that&#8217;s how most of us go in. [Example - I went into LinkedIn with the explicit purpose of recruiting a couple of specialists and was rewarded with the functionality for that task. I went into Twitter to see what the hype was all about, and was left guessing.]</p>
<p>Perhaps the answer is the platform should reward the new user in some substantial way on enrollment. Make sure the site provides a needed service, and does it well right away. The first time. Or perhaps show the user, in simple terms, the benefit to them of recruiting their friends and co-workers to the platform (something I don&#8217;t think we&#8217;ve seen from G-Wave).</p>
<p>Basically, if you want us to think your platform rocks, prove it the first time.</p>
<p>Another great post Chuck.</p>
<p>All IMHO,</p>
<p>David.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krishna Moorthy</title>
		<link>http://effectivecio.com/2009/11/11/now-what/#comment-1128</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Krishna Moorthy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://effectivecio.com/?p=1486#comment-1128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#039;s a use case out there, I am just not seeing it yet. Wave feels under-cooked at the moment. (Not to mention its user interface, which is confusing.) 

But if you google for Wave and &quot;Pulp Fiction&quot;, there&#039;s a mildly amusing demo of its utility :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a use case out there, I am just not seeing it yet. Wave feels under-cooked at the moment. (Not to mention its user interface, which is confusing.) </p>
<p>But if you google for Wave and &#8220;Pulp Fiction&#8221;, there&#8217;s a mildly amusing demo of its utility <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

