<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Way Too Much Information</title>
	<atom:link href="http://effectivecio.com/2009/12/02/way-too-much-information/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://effectivecio.com/2009/12/02/way-too-much-information/</link>
	<description>...ruminations on many things, all ultimately related to effective IT leadership...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 22:44:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Baker</title>
		<link>http://effectivecio.com/2009/12/02/way-too-much-information/#comment-1173</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Baker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://effectivecio.com/?p=1531#comment-1173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am still getting used to Wave and am trying to understand how it can be applied usefully for variety of activities. I do not mind people seeing me composing and changing my mind on an idea but it is difficult to follow someone else&#039;s train of thought PLUS that problem of responding to someones text to see it vanish and then having the dialog get out of phase are problems for me.
One night I participated in a public wave with a dozen participants. I had started with one person that I knew and we were doing the familiar IM back and forth when strangers started dropping into the wave and joining the conversation. It started to become more of a chat room on steroids. I found it difficult to keep track of what was going on since parallel conversations were taking place and people were amending/editing parts of the wave upstream of where I was. Whew!
We are used to a set of protocols (Twitter, IM, email, blogs etc) and Wave combines these in weird ways.
I would like to see small teams collaborating within and without a company using Wave on a project as a real test.
By the way here is a good book on Wave http://completewaveguide.com/
And if anyone wants to connect with me in the Wave I am john.mc.baker@googlewave.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am still getting used to Wave and am trying to understand how it can be applied usefully for variety of activities. I do not mind people seeing me composing and changing my mind on an idea but it is difficult to follow someone else&#8217;s train of thought PLUS that problem of responding to someones text to see it vanish and then having the dialog get out of phase are problems for me.<br />
One night I participated in a public wave with a dozen participants. I had started with one person that I knew and we were doing the familiar IM back and forth when strangers started dropping into the wave and joining the conversation. It started to become more of a chat room on steroids. I found it difficult to keep track of what was going on since parallel conversations were taking place and people were amending/editing parts of the wave upstream of where I was. Whew!<br />
We are used to a set of protocols (Twitter, IM, email, blogs etc) and Wave combines these in weird ways.<br />
I would like to see small teams collaborating within and without a company using Wave on a project as a real test.<br />
By the way here is a good book on Wave <a href="http://completewaveguide.com/" rel="nofollow">http://completewaveguide.com/</a><br />
And if anyone wants to connect with me in the Wave I am <a href="mailto:john.mc.baker@googlewave.com">john.mc.baker@googlewave.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

