Staying Out Of Holes February 18, 2009
Posted by Chuck Musciano in Leadership.Tags: Computing, Leadership, Software, Users
1 comment so far
Since the dawn of computing, we’ve worked really hard to make technology easier and more accessible. Computers started out in protected data centers, with mere mortals kept far, far away from actually using the machines. Today, we’ve pushed powerful tools into the hands of end users that enable them to do all sorts of amazing things on a regular basis.
As users become more comfortable with these tools, they try to acquire more of them. That’s a great thing, until those well-meaning end users get in over their heads and wind up holding a technology tiger by the tail.
Let’s be honest: computers, especially enterprise computing systems, are inordinately complicated. They are not easy to buy, install, configure, or maintain. It takes a a team of experienced professionals to make sure that a company buys the right systems, deploys them correctly, and maintains them for maximum business advantage. When end users try to take that on themselves, disaster invariably ensues.
Every CIO can tell a story about some non-IT organization that tried to buy some cool system without bringing IT into the picture. Typically, the first call comes about halfway into the implementation, when the project is behind schedule, the gory details are being exposed, and the poor users have no idea how to get out of the hole they have dug for themselves. By the time IT gets involved, lots of money and time has been wasted, and the cost of recovery far exceeds the project estimates and often outweighs any potential benefits of the system.
It is easy to blame these scenarios on the users. The real blame lies with IT. We need to build trust with our users so that they feel comfortable turning to us when they need a new system or have a problem to solve. The worst situations occur when IT is so inaccessible and arrogant that users prefer the pain of a bad implementation to the pain of dealing with IT.
Beyond earning trust, we also need to educate our users so they understand why our systems work the way they do, and how we integrate new technology to benefit everyone. Systems architecture is of little interest to end users, but we must teach them how we fit all the pieces together so they can see how we bring all these conflicting systems together.
Finally, IT brings a lot of non-technical benefits to any technology acquisition. In my experience, users make a good effort at finding a tool that has the right featurs to meet their needs. Where they completely miss the mark is with the contract and service details around the purchase. Users have no idea how to negotiate good pricing, or how to see through the smoke a vendor may be blowing their way. They don’t know about service level agreements, or good maintenance pricing, or how to write a contract that indemnifies them against a product failure. They don’t know how to evaluate a vendor for financial stability, or to know if their solution is a risky leading-edge idea or an outdated platform on its last legs. We know all these things, and we need to provide that assistance to our users.
Like almost every other aspect of our job, it starts with communications and trust. Begin by reaching out to users when they aren’t facing big problems. Calmer times give you the opportunity to explain what we do, why we do it, and how we can help. When users do reach out to us, bend over backwards to help them navigate the world of technology. Respect their needs and take time to figure out what they really need. Work hard when users aren’t in a hole, and you’ll eventually keep them from digging a new one.
No Surprises February 2, 2009
Posted by Chuck Musciano in Leadership.Tags: Communication, Leadership, Surprises
3 comments
What’s the worst thing that can happen to any leader? Bad news? Terrible news? No. The worst thing that can happen is surprising news.
I can handle problems of all shapes and sizes. Personnel issues, system failures, budget concerns, project setbacks: part and parcel of the job. With any of these, the easiest way to handle any problem is when it is a small problem, before it becomes a big problem. Big problems are hard; small problems are easy.
What infuriates me is when an issue builds over time and is then dumped in my lap, full-blown. At this point, the solution is going to be complicated, expensive, and leave collateral damage. Had I known earlier, I could have intervened in some more effective way.
Leaders get surprised when their people fail to keep them informed. There is only so much information we can gather on our own. Everything else comes to us from people who feel that they can tell us things, especially bad news, without fear of repercussions. These people are crucial to our success; they form our early-warning system that eliminate surprises.
We must cultivate trust in our team to ensure that we maintain that open channel of communication. When that trust is missing, people will stop communicating, either passively or actively.
In the passive mode, people just stop telling you things. They don’t misrepresent things or try to sugarcoat bad news. You lose a valuable source of information, so you are flying blind with respect to some aspect of your organization.
Far worse is the active mode. In this mode, people stop bringing you bad news by replacing it with good news. Projects are said to be on track when they really aren’t. Systems are said to be stable when they really aren’t. People are said to be happy when they really aren’t. At best, these people think they are pleasing you by bringing you good news while frantically trying to fix the underlying problems. At worst, they are being openly insubordinate and undermining your ability to lead.
You can cure both of these problems. The passive folks can be won over by regaining their trust. You must work to keep lines of communication open, as I’ve noted in previous posts. These people will help you succeed, but only if you work hard to allow them.
Even with open communication, the active group can be difficult to change. You have to actively solicit bad news and drill into data to make sure it represents the truth. For those who always want to bring good news, active coaching can help change their behavior. For those who are being intentionally duplicitous, I suggest providing them an opportunity to find success in a different organization.
Can You Fix This? January 30, 2009
Posted by Chuck Musciano in Leadership.Tags: Customer Service, Gadgets, Leadership, Management Skills
3 comments
I’m a gadget guy. I’ve been fascinated by things with blinking lights for a long time. Before I had access to computers, I built Heathkit radios. Before that, Erector sets and Legos. I love to tinker and figure out how things work. It led me to computing, which has led to great happiness in my career.
I think technical expertise makes me an effective CIO when I deal with other IT people, especially on my own team. I know enough to hold my own in technical discussion, and bring a lot of experience to the table as we try to design new systems and solve problems. I think a non-technical CIO can be easily overrun by their people and make bad decisions.
But does all that technical expertise make me an effective CIO among other executives? My management peers turn to me to solve quick problems with their phones, PDAs, and laptops. I get asked for advice on televisions and home networking. I never turn down such requests, if for no other reason than that it would be rude to refuse to help anyone. But I worry that such help pigeonholes me (and other technical CIOs) as the nerdy A/V guy, forever destined to set up the projector and advance the filmstrip during class.
CIOs have fought hard to get real management visibility and recognition. But we cannot ignore our technical roots. We have to strike a balance between our business skills and our technical skills. Done right, we retain our management focus while bringing technical perspective to the discussion at hand. Done poorly, we forever lose credibility among our peers.
Every CIO should seek to be seen as a good business leader with technology skills, not as a technology provider who happens to know a bit about business. Sometimes, the only way to reinforce that perception is to let someone else set up the projector.
